BWP_LEADERS_0607

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Creeping back into the world

Hello,
I'm finally getting "almost" caught up after my mother's passing and everything that goes with that. I can start being available for interviews etc and get my head back into BWP issues. kat

Thursday, February 15, 2007

If you're trying to get ahold of me

My mother isn't expected to make it through the night (she has been ill for a long time) and I am flying out in the morning to go to Michigan to make arrangements, etc. I will not be available for BWP issues for a couple weeks. Katherine

Monday, December 18, 2006

Key to Recruiting/Happy Holidays/Thank you

Hi Y'all!

I ran into this great article on resources for site leaders: http://www.writingproject.org/cs/nwpp/print/nwpr/1571

Anyway, the essence of it is that the key to recruiting is to have TCs nominate a teacher from their school. Joyce and I had already thought of that--Project Inside Out--growing from the inside out. So, this affirms that approach. She and I are going to work together to get an e-mail/letter out to the TCs and see if we can get nominations and applications. I note that BAWP (the site that wrote this) mails letters to TCs at home asking for nominations. That might work--with a self addressed stamped envelope! Something we can try anyway!

There are some great articles and resources on that site--

Happy Holidays and Thanks for ALL You Have Done! Your representation at national and all the many activities we have done has just been stellar. The project wouldn't exist without your leadership. Thanks to all!!!!!


The Voice January-February 2000
print version
The Key to Recruiting: Teachers Nominating Teachers

By Carol Tateishi
Summary: Carol Tatateishi, director of the Bay Area Writing Project, discusses strategies for summer institute recruitment.

The quality of the work of the Bay Area Writing Project is directly commensurate with the quality of its teachers consultants. For this reason, the identification, nomination and selection of summer Fellows is paramount at our project. This process is a year-round effort, shared by the whole BAWP community. At their school sites, in their wider spheres of professional work, and as leaders in the project's summer and school-year programs, BAWP TCs are alert to the possibilities of their colleagues as potential summer institute Fellows. Regulary I speak with TCs who say things like, "I can't wait to nominate this great teacher at my school!" We impress on our TCs the need to be selective in this search for prospects. As a result, we'll hear comments like, "There's this teacher I'm thinking about for the institute who'll be ready in a few years," or, "I know of this really good teacher for the institute, but I need to find out a little more about her."

BAWP TCs help sustain the project's excellence through the quality of each year's summer Fellows. In and of itself, this process has become a form of professional development: for TCs, identifying and nominating candidates fosters their own leadership as they seek excellence in their colleagues and mentor and promote the leadership of others; for nominees, the process honors their teaching, elevates them as professionals and creates new collegial relationships between them and BAWP TCs. A quick perusal of the BAWP Teacher Consultant Roster offers evidence of this process at work. One will find large numbers of TCs in certain schools or districts, all started by the participation of one BAWP TC.

As important as this process is, it can also be limiting in terms of access and equity for teachers who have no collegial pipeline into the project. So, the process needs to include recruitment and nomination strategies which are aggressive in seeking teachers important to a site's goals and beliefs and thoughtfully pro-active in creating accessibility to the institute for a wide range of teachers.

Given these general comments about BAWP's nomination process, let me move to some nuts and bolts. Every aspect of our nomination and selection process is designed with our teacher audience in mind. Most BAWP TCs and their colleagues are overextended in their professional lives; their personal lives are filled with family, friends and activities. Here are some ways we recognize that our audience is short on time:

* we mail our initial request for nominations to TCs homes, knowing the letter can disappear in the stacks of things on people's desks at work;

* we use a very simple nomination form which asks for a nominee's name and school with home information optional, knowing that getting this information means one more thing to do;

* we encourage TCs to call in their nominations, fax or email them, knowing that getting a letter addressed and to the mailbox can be a hurdle;

* we make the institute application something do-able for a busy teacher at the end of a school day with questions that we think are worth writing about and which lead into the key questions of an interview.

These small things have made a difference.

When the applications begin rolling in, we send out bright green response cards to TCs or other educators who made the nomination, letting them know so-and-so has applied. Around February, we send out nomination reminder notices to people and also a request of those who have not received green cards to encourage their nominees to apply. In the meantime, we begin our hour-long, one-to-one interviews with nominees we've selected, based on their applications. Our interviews usually take place from February through mid-April. Almost all are after school on the UC Berkeley campus, although in special circumstances an interview may be held at the nominee's school.

What I've described so far are the surface procedures in our office. Beyond this, or should I say, underneath this, another set of activities are taking place. Marty Williams and Helen Ying, BAWP co-directors, other key BAWP leaders and I are working strategically, talking to TCs we believe are in good positions to help address target areas of our programs through their nominations.

For example, increasing the diversity of our summer institute Fellows has long been part of our effort. Other special efforts are directed at teachers of English language learners and teachers of students in low-income communities. More recently we have sought teachers involved in school reform, teachers working successfully in integrating technology into their practice, and teachers leading parent programs in their schools. Bottom line, of course, is the quality of their practice in teaching writing. In addition, we also directly contact potential nominees and nominees who haven't yet applied whose participation we seek.

On the BAWP application, there is a very important little box people can check: "I would be interested in participating in a future BAWP summer institute. It will not be possible to participate this summer." We hope this box sends the message to people that BAWP is not a one-shot chance for anyone. When people are ready, we are here. I, myself, took three years to apply back in 1983. While I very much respected the TCs at my school who nominated me, Jim Gray was still just a name to me, and I had no idea just how wonderful and transformative the summer institute would be. I was an overworked middle school teacher with two little kids at home, a husband and a visceral need for a summer respite. But my colleagues didn't give up on me, and eventually I took the step. Now as a writing project director, I want to ensure that BAWP doesn't ever give up on anyone either, and this consideration is part of our nomination and selection process as well.

The Key to Recruiting: Teachers Nominating Teachers
PDF Download PDF | Download Help

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Attach?

Ok, what am I missing here? I don't see an icon that will let me attach anything but a picture, and I want to attach the Power Point slide that is our flier for the Midwinter Literacy Conference

Update on Mid Winter Literacy Conference: Writing to Learn

Hi Leaders:

I'm putting up a place where Joyce and I and anyone else who is helping with the Mid Winter Conference can post messages, information, notes, reminders and ideas.


When: Feb 3, 2006, 9-1
Where: Hereford University Center, Rio Grande Ballroom at UTA
Concurrent Sessions in "Smart Rooms" in Trimble Hall
Brandon Gunnip has been contacted to help with presenters with technology. He's our tech specialist at UTA COED.

We would love it if our Scott Floyd could come also! (and bring your wife!!!!)

Flyer attached

Joyce has passed out handouts to Literacy Coaches

Jeannine has sent handouts to Coppell and Grapevine Colleyville and will be giving some to Carrolton/Farmer's Branch.

I am going to mail flyers and follow up with a phone call and or visit if I can get appts with some of the smaller districts around us. I'm thinking of south of us, so that we don't intrude on North Star's space. I'd like to look at working with the small rural districts. Suggestions for districts? Anyone have contacts at these districts? A personal contact always helps gets a foot in the door.

I guess maybe I should mail out flyers to all our TCs to pass out at their schools. What do you think?

I have contacted Scholastic for a book fair as has Joyce. I'm just going to be a terrier and stay after them until they call us back! We have to go through their Waco store rather than the Arlington store for book fairs.

We need to hit the ground running in January and I'll be packaging up materials: pamphlet, conference flyer, applications for SI. We need to wrap up the SI aps seriously by the weekend after the conference.

I'm thinking we might have an interview committee at the conference and if someone indicates an interest, we could just have Bluebonnets take them aside and do a 15 minute interview.

I'm thinking that the "memo of understanding" which says if you accept you will give us six weeks notice if you have to drop in order that your place may be given to someone else, should be put on that triplicate paper!

So my big focus, is going to be RECRUITING for the conference and the SI!

We need committees and ideas!
Maybe you can forward those to Joyce!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm just putting up things she and I have already discussed so we have a point of reference over the next two months!!!


Merry Christmas (yes, I say Merry Christmas)!

Friday, December 01, 2006

2007-2008 Renewal Grant

Thanks to all who have added their parts to this.
You can add yours by going to: http://docs.google.com/
I invited you several weeks ago to join Google Docs. Scott, I just reissued your invitation to collaborate. I think if you just go to this site and join you will see the document.

Joyce, put up our grant from last year and wrote her changes in pink.

Please, please, please add your part--I have directions on the document about who need to add what. You can revise the exisiting information or delete it and add your part, but we've got to get this document done by Sunday afternoon so I can do final edits and meet with my department chair on Monday for her approval.

The schedule that is in the grant Joyce put up is from 04-05 so if anybody has easy access to 05--06 and would like to replace the 04-05 one that would be great!

THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Saturday, November 25, 2006

BWP_LEADERS_0607

This is the way we went to Tennessee.....
Traveling with Joyce and the BWP at the NWP conference in NASHVILLE Tennessee!

It was a cold and blustery day in the neighborhood! Trees were whipping in the wind and leaves flurried to the ground. This cannot be optimal flying conditions, and alas, it wasn’t! Our flight was cancelled, delayed, delayed again, and again and again…Katherine, Scott and I finally boarded a plane (Scott was on standby, but it proved to be a successful venture!) Our fair Janelle, she was cancelled, delayed, delayed and delayed some more. She finally arrived in Opryland-world after 10:00pm. WHEW! What a start! We were not alone; the keynote for the NCTE convention was unable to make his flight. Bad weather abounded, but it didn’t keep all of us from having a wonderful learning experience!

Wednesday was chaotic, but it didn’t stop once we landed. Scott, who had made his lodging accommodations at a nice, clean hotel, well, we were all envious of him! He was gallant enough to trudge with us across what seemed like miles and miles to our LOVELY hotel about ¾ ‘s of a mile from him…we renamed our hotel to the DIScomfort Inn, and we were in varying degrees of, well, discomfort. We all survived the night…our little 6-legged friends and all, and we went directly to another room without passing “go”.

Thursday was a great day for me. I really loved hearing about the work being done by other WP’s. We had the session: The Little Rock Writing Project Presented on an organized approach to go into school districts by
ÿ creating a “who to call” at the district level
ÿ placing a donate icon on the website for interested parties to donate immediately to the LRWP
ÿ they were able to work with a district and asked if they would match money for professional development—the district agreed
ÿ designed “logo” and use the logo on all correspondence and several types of clothing
ÿ Offered an Advanced Institute for previous SI members to hone their areas of interest and knowledge
ÿ Used the Advanced Institute as a means of having individuals work with specific districts/schools and to report back their findings

Interesting Tidbits:
ÿ Some districts match funds, as much as $14,000.00 by one school.
ÿ They used a list-serv to help dialogue.
ÿ The list-serv was also part of the graduate student’s coursework in one class.
ÿ They kept all 8 budgets separated for easy bookkeeping.
ÿ They kept the TC:SI participants at a 3-4:10 ratio.
ÿ They had heard that educators wanted more of a lab situation for their professional development and SI.

The Denver Writing Project was represented by Richard Argys and Sarah Woodard. They approached a dual focus of looking at the content area of mathematics and literacy. The question posed was: What can teachers do to address attitudes, misconceptions and anxiety that kids have about math? How does writing about math (problem solving, the process, the steps) help learners?

The Denver Writing Project used the trinal model of professional development. They started with a study group, then an inservice program and then, they were not that far in the process at this point to know what the next steps might be.

At the High School Level:
ÿ Phase I
o (2003-2004) was a Study Group of ESL learners needs.{There were problems identified, the inquiry was established for the year}
ÿ Phase II
o (2004-2005) presented a continuation of the ESL Study Group (some problems were solved, but many were still at the idea stage)
o Presentations by Teaching Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum. {Special Education, Math, Science, Social Studies…}
ÿ Phase III
o (2005-2006) the study grou switched to writing and did not fair as well
o The Teaching Writing across the Content Area only had about 8 active people
o There were district presentations on the Teaching Reading and Writing Across the Curriculum was a failure and only 2 people attended
ÿ Phase IV
o (2006-2007) They are presenting at the district level Teaching Non-Fiction Writing Across the Curriculum which is leading them back to the planning stage of involving the ESL study of this process…bringing it full circle

That afternoon, I went to a session on recruiting—from invitation to in-service-- how to grow a new TC:

Dr. Harriett Williams of the Santee Wateree Writing Project (SWWP) provided handouts on their individuation of the SI for their Fellows. There are commonalities in several of the Writing Projects, but each has a unique twist to the SI for their participants. This is how their SI works:
o Many apply for the Invitation Institute. There is a meeting from approximately 3:30-9:00pm where the texts are chosen and there is reading and writing. An interview is held and the decision of whether there will be 3 or 6 graduate hours earned is declared by the prospective Fellow. They like the numbers of 12-18 Fellows.
o There is a Teacher-Research Conference in late April. There will be about 50-60 TC’s there. The incoming Fellows will be entering a community. This session is considered Continuity and is a presentation of the research in and out of the classroom that they have conducted. They are given the choice of two topics to bring with them to “Boot Camp” as a working draft.
o In Early May, there is a “Boot Camp” for all the incoming SI participants. It is a day of Writing and Sharing and mirrors Day 1 of the SI. There are also TC Demos. The theory and planning of the demos is deconstructed (choose thoughtful presenters). Books are chosen by participants as those they would use in their classrooms.
o In Late May, the Groups meet three times and prepare one piece of writing. Separate pieces, but on a similar topic.
o Teacher Research Applications are due in early June.
o There are 15 meetings held in June 8:30-3:30 with a working lunch. They begin creation of their portfolio, choose “that thing you always said you’d do if you had time” and a discussion of protocols for Group Letters to participants for their presentation. This is the plan for their inquiry.
o In Late July there is a book sale which generates income for the SWWP. There is a Back to School Conference which serves as Continuity and allows the new TC’s to give their presentations.
o Late July is also time that Projects are Due, Presenters are Selected for Concurrent Sessions at the April Teacher-Research Conferences.
o In order to receive the entire 6 graduate credits, they must create a portfolio, with all previous drafts and an individual explanation of how this work spans Britton’s Continuum. They also have a series of questions regarding their work that will be reflective in nature. They are also asked if there are follow-up activities that they need to continue their growth and work on these topics.

The Red Cedar Writing Project was represented by Mitch Nobis, Co-Director. Their Si is held over the span of 5 weeks to 4 weeks and split the other 5 days throughout the year. They also use these 5 days as Continuity events. Work is started in SI and continued until complete. There are up to 6 hours of graduate credit given. Three are for the completion of a portfolio and 3 more are earned through a Teacher Inquiry project. Approximatley 60-70% of SI participants earn the full 6 hours. The teaching demos are 60-75 minutes and they earn letter grades for the coursework. There is a syllabus just like in any graduate level course. There is a choice of a stipend, 3 hours of graduate level credit or 6 hours of graduate level credit that can be earned.

They are working very diligently on retention and “payback” for the graduate credit. They are tying more follow-through into their SI’s.

Their schedule looks like this:
o 1 Day in May 5-9pm
o 3 Days at the end of May (Thurs., Fri., Sat.) 12-9, 9-9, 9-3
o 15 days in July 9-3 with a working lunch

They form professional reading groups on the first day and are guided through the expectations of SI. There is one coach for each Fellow.

The first 2 weeks they model for the Fellows and guide TC’s to create transactional writing models. Try out different voices.

On the 3 Days in May, they bring a piece of writing of their “practice.” What they are as professionals. As a teacher, I look at what is important. I come up with questions, with the help of my group. They cam eup with creative representations-ask about inquiry. Looked at themes that occurred—many were related to writing across curriculum, inclusion, differentiation, writing. They were all grouped based upon inquiry. They practiced their listening skills and the lists that were generated were shared at their next meeting.

They reviewed their interview process. They chose excited people from a Visitor’s Day that they hold each Spring. There are applications and they go through each application and look for heterogeneous individuals, sparks that stick-out in the process, they look for a rich, diverse mix. They ask them to talk about the writing project…not a course. What is an issue today that concerns you? What participation, practice, process would you like to know more about? What strategies that work or challenge you in the classroom? What types of writing do you currently do? How do you feel about sharing your work with other people? What do you think you will be writing about? What areas of Continuity would you be available to do after SI (professional development, study groups,etc…)

In the late spring they hold a dinner. The presentations held during the dinner are like their “open house” and everyone is invited to participate. Even those who were not chosen to be included this year, they are encouraged to reapply next year.

The interview’s are held by a University represenatative, the Director, all Co-Directors, and a Senior Fellow from the previous year. They re-read their letter of intent and review notes from the interview. Strands that standout and inquiry ideas are gathered even before selection.

By the SI in June they have created writing, drafts, read a book and met with others. Rarely do they ask for their written copy on the first day in case someone has forgotten, they just state that they got “too busy” and to bring their writing again tomorrow.

Approximately 5-6 weeks before the SI dinner, one abbreviated demo is chosen and the evening is like a truncated Day 1.

There are 5 lenses that they need to use when they are reflecting about their own demos or those of their colleagues.
1. Integration of subjects.
2. Drawing helps connect writing.
3. Building community is integral to group writing success.
4. Curricula that relates and reflects the writers in the room.
5. Potential areas of concern—the what if’s.

Each group will take an area of the presentation and present the information through one of the above lenses.

We had our morning breakfast with the entire Texas WP crew on Friday and it was a wondermous opportunity to bond with other worker bees from Texas. It was so wonderful to see all of the Texas Writing Project participants together. It was such a great beginning to our visionary day. It brings us together physically and emotionally.

Friday morning was a great speech, despite a technical difficulty with the microphone. It is always so moving and powerful to see others that work hard (or harder!) than I do, those who have the great inspiration that I have, and the commonalities that I share in my love of literacy. It was another great presentation of information, here is what I gathered:

o Writing should be at the top of school reform
o When teens were asked why they left school it was because they considered school boring, uninteresting and alienating
o The Youth Dreamers—a group of 11-15 year olds who are writing for real purpose, making a future for the youth of today
o Their voices were heard
o Too many young people get into trouble after school and through this understanding, the Youth Dreamers were “born”
o They wrote grants and received money
o Ninety-eight percent of teachers stay in education throughout their careers
o Seventy-two percent of these teachers stay in the classroom
o Operations Home Comings allows those who have experienced the war to write about their experiences
o The “Bipartisan Effort” touted by politicians was NCLB
o In 2004-2005, there were 95,000 individual teachers served in one year
o What proportions of learners were served in one year by NWP? 1/35, approximately 2.9%-this percentage is 1/8 in elementary schools.
o Fifty-seven percent of NWP sites are over 10 years old
o Nineteen percent of NWP sites are over 25 years old
o New NWP sites in the past five years—48
o Eighty percent of SI’s used technology in their writing/learning
o Ninety-seven percent say that NWP provides better staff development than other professional development opportunities
o Ninety-six percent of TC’s say they learned how to be a better teacher because of NWP
o Milton’s theory of False Knowledge transfers to learning. A one-time shot of learning is NOT the key to increased knowledge
o Teachers who over rate themselves are the most limited teachers
o Writing has been understood to be the most powerful instrument we use
o Writing in SI transforms teachers emotionally, intellectually, and forever

We were asked to write about what led us to teaching and here is my unfinished piece:

I chose to go to school after staying home with my 3 kids. I went to college with 3 credit hours under my arm and decided I would teach kinders when I completed my education. It was my husband, Curt, who knew my calling when I had no idea what the next venture in my life would lead. At 33, I enrolled at the University of Central Oklahoma, in Edmond, Oklahoma and worked for 2 ½ years to accumulate knowledge and a cadre of courses that I felt were necessary to teach. I entered the world of teacher’s education with the eyes of a mom. As a mom who had raised 3 literate youngsters, and was now ready to embark through the experiences that a classroom of 4 and 5 year olds would hold. I was terrified and exhilarated. I was green, but wise…I still smile when I think that my husband was the one who knew and has always known what I needed to do, he said that it was just as obvious as day to him. Wow! I wish I had taken off my sunglasses YEARS ago!

After the general session, Jeannine, Janelle, Katherine, Scott and I went to the coolest restaurant, The Aquarium, in Opry Mills. It was a very therapeutic respite in the middle of a crazy and busy day. Aside from being surrounded by fish and water, we shared a good meal and some great conversation. We had the opportunity to get together and debrief. We started sharing our vision of the future, our involvement in the BWP and the growth and nurturing that our tiny, but growing Bluebonnet WP needs. You really need to stop by and see this restaurant when you are in Nashville. Great ambiance!

That afternoon, I had the opportunity to attend a life changing institute, it was on social change and how it can be a catalyst for writing; important, purposeful writing. I cannot wait to share some of the great information that I learned while in this session. The educator who was responsible for the example of life-changing writing was one of the presentors that I had the opportunity to work with, first-hand, in the afternoon session. It was so powerful and moving. I felt like I was going to fly back home under my OWN power. It was so interesting and such a great opportunity to learn. Here are the highlights of the session:

Although I have heard that there was a maniacal driver zipping up and down I-40, I do know that she had every intention of getting us to and fro in the shortest amount of time possible. Let’s just say that no one was injured in the venture AND wonderful or LOVELESS biscuits were procured by all that rode in the speedy Nissan, well, less one who doesn’t like biscuits L ! Pass the good ole’ country cooking!

The next day the flight to Bluebonnet land was problem-free and we all made it home Saturday without any weather, turbulence, or lost baggage.

We all came home tired, full of ideas, and just ready to conquer the world. Hang on UTA and outlying areas, we are coming back and ready to change the world one learner at a time…

BWP_LEADERS_0607

BWP_LEADERS_0607

BWP_LEADERS_0607

Hi All! I have added the grant and budget information on the googledocs site. I couldn't get the organizational chart...so I will forward that out to you's guys in a few...

Happy Post-Thanksgiving!

Joyce :)

Friday, November 24, 2006

Renewal Grant: Please add your piece in http://docs.google.com

Hi Please add the pieces requested below to the collaborative doc I'm sharing with each of you at: http://docs.google.com/

Thanks so much.
If you have trouble accessing that doc let me know. I sent you an invitation to become part of docs.google.com and shared this document with you.

2007-2008
National Writing Project Renewal Grant




Scott: Add a report of what our site has done with technology and what we plan to do.

Janelle: Add a report of what our site has done with ELL and what we plan to do.

Janelle: Add a report of what our site has done with Community Activities (Young Author) and what we plan to do.

Jill: Add a report of what our site has done with professional development and what we plan to do. (You can certainly use some of your paper that you wrote at the retreat in this part)

Janelle/Scott/Jeannine --Janelle and Scott will you take the lead in writing a report on what we have done with our staff development and continuity online and what we plan to do. I'll add what I need to.

Joyce--Will you copy in your report about what we've done in continuity and what we plan to do (this includes last year and this year's midwinter conference).

Katherine--Will you add in any information you can see that we might apply for grants for (it would probably be in one of the above areas). E-mail the leader in that area with your report and y'all discuss how to integrate it.



Thanks so much. I want to pull this together on December 1, 2006, if possible.

Scott, I'm updating our Inverness information --the staff development part and I"ll send that to you and cc you on what I"m sending to Allison from Inverness to add to our report! Thanks!

posted by Jeannine Hirtle at 2:56 AM

Directions from NWP for Renewal Grant 2007-2008

National Writing Project 2007 Continued Funding Application

INSTRUCTIONS


Purposes of the Continued Funding Application
The Continued Funding Application is completed each year by active NWP sites. It is both a progress report on the site’s current work and a place to share thinking about future goals and plans. The application includes a Requested Budget to support the upcoming year’s activities.

The primary purpose of the report is to document that each site fulfills the federal funding requirements to 1) implement the National Writing Project program design and 2) show compliance with the requirements of Public Law 107-110 (No Child Left Behind).

Additional purposes of the application are

1. to allow site leaders to analyze the work of the site and to consider refinements that will improve it

2. to address issues specific to the site

3. to contribute to the knowledge base that informs the entire NWP network.

Audience
Your application will be read by colleagues including National Writing Project site directors and co-directors from around the country, as well as by NWP staff. The application may be read by reviewers unfamiliar with your site and its history and service area. Please give enough information to help your readers understand your context, particularly as it shapes the work of your site.

THE NATIONAL WRITING PROJECT

All National Writing Project sites focus on the core mission of improving the teaching of writing and the use of writing across the disciplines by offering high-quality professional development programs for educators in their service areas, K–16 and across the curriculum. NWP sites share a national program model that includes 1) developing a leadership cadre of local teachers who have participated in invitational summer institutes in the teaching of writing; 2) delivering customized inservice programs for local schools and institutions; and 3) providing continuing education and research opportunities for teachers. In addition, NWP sites may conduct programs for youth, for parents and community members, and for administrators. Each NWP site is housed in a college or university and is constituted as a school/university partnership that identifies, celebrates, and enhances the professional role of successful classroom teachers.

Overview of the Application Process
Summer
□ Download all instructions and forms for the Continued Funding Application (CFA) from NWP website.

□ Read the instructions and application form.

□ Plan your site leadership’s thinking and writing process to complete the application by the January deadline.

Fall
□ Prepare the Continued Funding Application narrative.

□ Assemble and plan for completion of all elements of CFA: narrative, Requested Budget, summer institute schedule, site leadership structure, appendixes (if needed).

□ As you create and save electronic documents, follow NWP naming protocols for online submission.

Related work:

Submit data online for the Site Profile (via Inverness Research Associates). In conjunction with this, submit final budget data online to NWP’s website as a final report for the previously completed grant year. Both the Site Profile and the Final Budget will be reviewed as part of the new application.

Distribute information about supplemental funding opportunities, such as minigrants, to site.

Fall/Winter
□ Assemble final edition of all elements, sign application, and complete checklist.

□ Submit completed CFA, including this Instructions document, to department and university units for signature.

□ Once signatures are complete, make four copies of hardcopy application (not including this Instructions document).

□ In time to meet January deadline, send original and four paper copies of complete CFA to NWP.

□ In time to meet January deadline, submit electronic copy of each required element online to NWP.

Spring
□ NWP will review your application in February 2007 and respond to your site by March 2007.

□ NWP will send contract amendment by mid-May 2007. Grant checks will follow in June.


Guidelines for the Continued Funding Application

Scope of the Application
The narrative should include a review of programs completed during the 2005–2006 academic year and the summer of 2006. You will also discuss plans and projections for 2007–2008, the coming year for which you are requesting funding. (You will report on programs for 2006–2007, the current funding year, in next year’s report, but you are welcome to comment on them in this year’s report as appropriate.)

The report should be analytical as well as informational. Let your readers in on your thinking. For example, discuss why the program is designed the way it is; who designed, conducted, and participated in it; what worked and what refinements you will make in the future. Be specific and include names of teacher-leaders as appropriate.

Refer to the Annual Site Profile (completed online in October via Inverness Research Associates; http://nwpsurvey.org) and make connections to the data, as well as to your Requested and Final Budgets.

Optional: Appendixes may include a single copy of a site’s brochures, newsletters, publications, or other items. Since time is limited, reviewers cannot do more than glance at these items and many sites choose not to send appendixes. Reviewers will not be able to access links to online resources during the review.

Signatures
Plan ahead to obtain signatures on the completed application from your site leaders, university department, and university contract office, taking into account the winter holiday break at your institution as it relates to the January submission deadline.

Preparing the Application
Download all of the documents, templates, and samples from the NWP website (http://www.writingproject.org/cs/nwpp/print/pa/44). As you complete them, save each element as a separate document in its original format (for example, as an MS Word document or an MS Excel spreadsheet). As soon as you start entry on this document, please “save as” and rename it using the following naming protocol:

• Two-letter state mailing code
• Site name, not including “Writing Project” or “WP”
• 2007
• Document name

Example: CA Bay Area 2007 Narrative



In addition to submitting paper copies, you will need to submit each electronic document online. Do not embed or combine any of the electronic documents or submit as PDFs. The National Writing Project online submission cannot accept documents saved as PDFs.

Submitting the Application
Hard (paper) copies: All required elements of the application must be received in the NWP national office by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 10, 2007. Mail hardcopy original and four (4) copies to:

Richard Sterling, Executive Director
National Writing Project
2105 Bancroft Way #1042
Berkeley, CA 94720-1042

Telephone: 510-642-0963.

Electronic copies: The online submission period is Thursday, January 4 through Wednesday, January 10, 2007. When all elements are ready for online submission, go to http://www.writingproject.org/cs/nwpp/print/pa/44 and follow the instructions for submitting.


Elements of the Application

Overview
The Narrative and Forms document includes forms that need to be completed inside the document (Site Contact Information, Site Leadership Contact Information); questions requiring text answers (Narrative); and forms that need to be printed out and signed and submitted on paper only (Certificate of Compliance, Signature Page, and Checklist). Additional required elements that should be attached to the paper copy and submitted as separate electronic documents are the Site Leadership Map, Summer Institute Schedule, and Requested Budget. If applicable, include a CV for any new site director or co-director. Appendixes are optional (see SCOPE OF THE APPLICATION, above).

NARRATIVE AND FORMS ATTACHMENTS
Submit paper copy and submit as one electronic document Submit paper copies and submit as separate electronic documents
• Site Contact Information • Site Leadership Map
• Site Leadership Contact Information • Summer Institute Schedule
• Questions requiring text answers (Narrative) • Requested Budget
Complete and submit on paper only Attach paper copy only, if applicable
• Certificate of Compliance • CV for new site director or co-director
• Signature Page • Optional: Appendix
• Complete Application Checklist

Site and Site Leadership Contact Information
At the beginning of the Narrative and Forms document, complete the NWP Site Contact Information. This information is for the site as an entity (office address, phone, fax, and so forth). Then, for each leader at the site (director, co-director/s, technology liaison, etc.), complete a Site Leader Contact form. Copy and complete additional site leader information blanks as needed. List site leaders only; do not include administrative staff for the site.

Narrative
For the narrative, use the same headings and order as in the Narrative and Forms document (you do not need to include the questions in your final document). Use a 12-point font and one-inch margins. Save and submit the document as a Microsoft Word file. As soon as you start entry on this document, please “save as” and rename it using the following naming protocol:

• Two-letter state mailing code
• Site name, not including “Writing Project” or “WP”
• 2007
• Document name
Example: CA Bay Area 2007 Narrative
Do not embed any of the supporting items into the Narrative and Forms document (such as Site Leadership Map, Summer Institute Schedule, and Requested Budget). Save and submit these as separate documents.

This document is submitted both on paper and electronically.

Site Leadership Map
Download the template and sample from the NWP website at http://www.writingproject.org/cs/nwpp/print/pa/44. As soon as you start entry on this document, please “save as” and rename it using this naming protocol:

• Two-letter state mailing code
• Site name, not including “Writing Project” or “WP”
• 2007
• Document name (“Site Map”)

Example: CA Bay Area 2007 Site Map

Print and attach the document to your paper application. Save your final electronic document for online submission as a separate Microsoft Word document. That is, do not embed it into the narrative. Do not substitute another format like a PDF file.

You may adapt the map structure and change terminology to suit your needs.

This document is submitted both on paper and electronically.

Summer Institute Schedule
Download the template and sample from the NWP website at http://www.writingproject.org/cs/nwpp/print/pa/44. As soon as you start entry on this document, please “save as” and rename it using this naming protocol:

• Two-letter state mailing code
• Site name, not including “Writing Project” or “WP”
• 2007
• Document name (“SI Schedule”)

Example: CA Bay Area 2007 SI Schedule

Print and attach the document to your hardcopy application. Save your final electronic document for online submission as a separate Microsoft Word document. That is, do not embed it into the narrative. Do not substitute another format like a PDF file.

In this section you must enter your summer institute information into the template provided.

This document is submitted both on paper and electronically.

Budget
See instructions in “Budget Form Instructions” section below.

This document is submitted both on paper and electronically.

Donor Letters
See instructions in “Compliance and Signature Forms” section below.

This document is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.

Certificate of Compliance
See instructions in “Compliance and Signature Forms” section below.

This document is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.

Signature Page
See instructions in “Compliance and Signature Forms” section below.

This document is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.

Complete Application Checklist
A checklist is provided at the end of the Narrative and Forms document. Please complete and sign the checklist and submit it with your final application.

This document is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.


Budget Form Instructions

Overview
Your Requested Budget should cover a one-year period beginning with your 2007 summer institute and continuing through the 2007–2008 academic year.

You may request up to $42,000, plus $3,000 to support the work of a technology liaison. If you request the technology liaison funds, please be sure to include a provision for travel to the annual meeting. Technology liaison support may also include stipends, supplies, or other expenses appropriate to the work of supporting the use of technology at the site.

Supplemental funding requests for activities such as network minigrants and special initiatives should not be included in your core budget when making your initial request. Later on, approved supplementary grants will be added to your core budget for the purposes of requesting major revisions or finalizing your financial reports at the end of a reporting cycle.

As of 2007–2008, each site’s annual NWP sponsorship fee is $500. (Please note: This is an increase from previous years.) As usual, this expense should be charged against a site’s locally raised funds. It may not be paid from federal funds.

Further guidelines for the contents of the budget are included in the budget template itself.

In addition to the Requested Budget form, the budget narrative will be included as the final element of the overall narrative. Further instructions for the budget narrative are in Part V of the Narrative and Forms document.

Resources
While preparing or revising your budget, please feel encouraged to contact Mike Mathis, NWP director of grants and contracts, for assistance. Phone: 510-643-6206. Email: mmathis@writingproject.org.

If your local circumstances are making it difficult for you to secure the required match, please contact Mike Mathis early to discuss strategies.

A sample budget is provided for your reference at http://www.writingproject.org/cs/nwpp/print/pa/44. You may also wish to refer to your Final Budgets from previous years as you work out your ideas for your new request.

Mechanics
Start by retrieving a current blank budget form from http://www.writingproject.org/cs/nwpp/print/pa/44. Be sure to save the form as an Excel spreadsheet, saving it to your own computer before beginning your work. As soon as you start entry on this document, please “save as” and rename it using this naming protocol:

• Two-letter state mailing code
• Site name, not including “Writing Project” or “WP”
• 2007
• Document name (“Budget”)

Example: CA Bay Area 2007 Budget

Do not embed the budget form into any other document. When finished, print copies to include with the paper copies of your completed application. You will also submit the Excel spreadsheet as part of your online electronic submission.

This year’s form is unchanged from last year.

Over the course of the program year, you will be free and encouraged to adjust this budget as needed to fit your changing programs. Be sure to save a copy of your original document before proceeding with a revision. Copies of substantial revisions may be emailed to Mike Mathis at any time. Continue this until your program year is finished and the budget has been adjusted to be in line with the program as it actually took place. (You will submit the final version of this budget in September of 2008.)

When you first open the spreadsheet, read the instructions at the top of the form. Delete the embedded instructions when you save the final version of the form, before printing and electronic submission.

Please do your best to get your budget to fit on one or two pages, formatted vertically (portrait).

Column and Line Instructions
Print out a copy of the blank budget form to refer to as you read these instructions.

Please provide a budget request for your core funding in column A that totals $42,000 and covers your programs in summer of 2007 and the 2007–2008 school year. You may also include an additional $3,000 to support a technology liaison.

Other columns are for estimating expenses that will be covered by other funding sources. For columns containing more than one source of funds, these sources should be named or explained in footnotes at the bottom of the form. The lines of the budget itself are for showing how each class of income will be spent.

Sections 1 and 2. Salaries and Benefits: Some salary and benefit amounts will be for instructional activities. Others will be for administrative activities. Especially for those amounts listed under column A, please list the instructional and administrative amounts on separate lines and indicate clearly which lines are instructional and which are administrative. For each column A entry, your budget narrative should briefly explain why it is instructional or why it is administrative. Anything reasonably closely associated with the instructional or teacher-enrichment process is considered instructional. “Administrative” would include general office clerical work and the site director’s general oversight of the project, as well as public relations and fundraising activities.

Section 3. Supplies/Printing/Office: Include the costs of books, copying, postage, phones, etc., here. For entries in column A, keep administrative costs listed separately from instructional costs. In your budget narrative, explain why each column A entry is either instructional or administrative if it isn’t obvious. All costs identifiably associated with institutes and workshops, newsletters, teaching materials, and activities like building Internet sites for teacher enrichment are instructional. The costs of record keeping, accounting, and general office maintenance are administrative.

Section 4. Stipends and Tuition: These are nearly always instructional by definition. Clarify in your narrative the entries in your budget showing how tuition is paid. If participants themselves pay any amounts in addition to other forms of tuition support, please include those amounts in column F. Your explanation in your budget narrative will help reviewers distinguish which tuition contributions—or reimbursements—come from schools or districts, from individual participants, from the university, from the state, and from NWP. All anticipated payments to people (other than salaries) for participating in activities and doing the work of the site should be included in this section.

Section 5. Travel: In addition to other travel costs in the budget, be sure to include travel costs for the NWP Annual Meeting in November, as well as any provision needed for the travel of your technology liaison.

Section 6. Other: Include in this section your local site’s $500 institutional sponsorship of the NWP. This sponsorship may be listed under any column except column A. We will send you an invoice in June 2007 for your convenience. This section may also be used for any kind of expense that does not seem to fit properly into the other sections. These are usually relatively minor items.

Compliance with Federal Funding Requirements
Income can only be reported once—either in the year you receive it or in the year you use it (preferably, the latter, so your budget can show how you use it). This avoids double-counting your match funds. Call Mike Mathis with questions on this.

Federal funds coming to you from any source other than the NWP must be shown in column D of the budget form. This does not include NCLB funding channeled to you by your state or your local schools and districts, which should show up in column C. Column D federal funds must be subtracted from your totals (see the line for this purpose near the bottom of the form) in order to calculate your match funding.

Programs that serve students—young writers camps, for example—may use NWP federal funds only for those elements that provide “professional development for participating teachers.” NWP funds may not be used to pay teacher-consultants for the teaching of the young writers.

Federal Restrictions: Because the source of funding for your basic annual grant is the U.S. Department of Education, the following restrictions must be closely adhered to and, where appropriate, documented in your files:

a. Entertainment and food-related expenses (other than travel-meal allowances) should not be included under NWP Support in column A. Please present these expenses under one of the other cost-sharing columns.

b. University overhead or “indirect costs” may be included on this form only as follows:

• Indirect costs that have been waived by the university may be listed at the bottom of the form after the totals as an indication of university support.

• Indirect costs may not appear in column A under any circumstances.

• Indirect costs may not be used to match the NWP funding.

• Indirect costs may not be included in the budget totals carried forward to the Certificate of Compliance with Federal Requirements.

c. University in-kind support may be included in column B as long as its cost is identifiable in your department’s or your university’s records. This includes things like faculty released time, a percentage of a person’s time for clerical support, and photocopying. It should not include university office or classroom space.

d. Administrative costs listed in column A may not exceed 10 percent of the funds requested from NWP. The total of column A administrative costs must also be listed on the Certificate of Compliance with Federal Requirements. Make sure your budget and the certificate agree with each other.

e. Columns B, C, E, and F reflect nonfederal sources of financial and in-kind support used to match or augment your federal funding. The total of all these columns taken together must at least equal the federal total in column A. Be sure the grand total of all of the budget columns matches the total listed on the Certificate of Compliance with Federal Requirements.

f. The sources of matching funds listed in column F will occasionally include some federal funds. Since no federal funds qualify to be included as part of your matching funds, please use the budget lines at the bottom of the table to subtract out the federal part and calculate your match total.

Note: Instructions for the Budget Narrative are Part V of the CFA Narrative instructions.


Compliance and Signature Forms

Certificate of Compliance
The blank form is included in the Narrative and Forms document. Complete the required information electronically before you print the form. Attach the original, with signature, to your completed application.

The Certificate of Compliance with Federal Requirements certifies that all regulations of Public Law 107-110 are met. (Public Law 107-110 is the funding legislation for the NWP.)

The dollar figures on the form must agree with the Requested Budget. The form must be completed, signed, and attached to your Continued Funding Application for your application to be complete. See additional instructions in the budget section.

This document is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.

Signature Page
The blank form is included in the Narrative and Forms document. Complete the required information electronically before you print the form. Attach the original to your completed application and obtain signatures.

Plan ahead to obtain signatures from your site leaders, university department, and university contract office, taking into account the winter holiday break at your institution as it relates to the January submission deadline.

A completed signature page with original signatures must be attached to the original copy of the CFA. It must contain a minimum of one signature from the NWP site and one signature from the host university.

This document is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.

Donor Letters
Content. Donor letters serve as important documentation of the support for a writing project site from university administrators, particularly department heads and deans. The letters provide an opportunity for key sponsors of the work of a site to make clear their substantial commitment to one of the site’s goals, which is to provide a strong link between host-university programs and the schools in the institution’s service area. The letters typically include information about the accomplishments of the site during the past year.

Each donor letter should name a specific dollar amount of cash or in-kind support, and should clearly identify the year of work for which the support is being committed. If university support is not sufficient to cover the minimum match requirement, then additional donor letters should be obtained from outside sources sufficient to make up the difference. For any part of a site’s projected match that exceeds the minimum requirement, donor letters are not required. But, especially for matches from outside sources, they are welcome and useful as a part of establishing sound contractual relationships between a site and its partners.

The donor letters collectively must specifically promise an amount of support at least equal to the minimum required match for the federal dollars being requested from NWP; that is, committing to at least $42,000 of the matching funds outlined in your budget. Sites applying for extra funds to support technology liaisons or minigrants should document a match at least equal to the requested funds.

Feel free to adapt the language of the sample donor letter below as appropriate for your institution.

Format. Donor letters must be printed on institutional letterhead, with current dates and specific reference to the year for which funds are being promised.

Original signed donor letters (not photocopies or faxes) must be attached to the original application.

This document is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.





Complete Application Checklist
The blank form is included in the Narrative and Forms document.

When you are ready to assemble and forward your completed application to obtain signatures, and once again before you submit it to the National Writing Project, review the Complete Application Checklist. When your application is complete, sign the checklist and include it with your hardcopy submission to the NWP.

The checklist is submitted on paper only; it is not submitted online.


THE COMPLETE APPLICATION IS DUE WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 10, 2007.

E-mails for BWP leadership

Hi Scott,

I was wondering if you could contact Cobe for the login/password information for Start Logic and get e-mails set up for Joyce specifically, me, and you and Janelle if you like. I was thinking that when we e-mail the TCs from past institutes that e-mails with txbluebonnetwp as part of the address might be more recognized than our individual e-mails? We could point them to our mailboxes, and/but I think some of Joyce's e-mails have gone unrecognized because of her addresss--people in the institute she didn't attend just don't know her. Because she's had to do correspondence for our continuity and now midwindter conference--if her e-mail read something like joyce@txbluebonnetwp.org that might get better response. Im not sure what the address would look like coming from Start Logic but I know we have some addresses in our mailbox.

Thanks,
Jeannine

P.S. Let me know if you need Cobe's e-mail.

Also, I noticed in the list serv from the Tech Liaisons that they were asking for examples of innovative sites. Do you want to share ours? Promote us please. I'd like to get all the recognition we can!

Thanks!